|
TERM |
DEFINITION |
|
Bilateral investment treaty (BIT)
|
The
first modern bilateral investment treaty was entered into in 1959
between Germany and Pakistan. Over the decades that followed an
increasing number of European countries concluded such treaties with
developing countries. Since the 1980s, several countries in the
Americas have signed a BIT with another country of the region.
Traditionally, BITs set standards for the promotion and legal
protection of foreign investments and investors. Some recent
agreements also include the free entry of investments and investors as
a feature of the treaty. |
|
Compensation for losses
|
Investment agreements do not, in principle, require a state to pay
compensation in a situation where an investor of another member
country suffers losses in the host country due to war or other armed
conflict, civil disturbances, state of emergency or similar events.
Most agreements, however, provide for national treatment and
most-favored-nation treatment in respect to any measure a member
country adopts or maintains related to those losses. |
|
Denial of benefits
|
A
Party to a trade or investment agreement may deny the benefits of the
Agreement to an investor of another Party that is an enterprise of
such other Party and to investments of that investor if investors of a
non-Party own or control the enterprise and the denying Party does not
maintain diplomatic relations with the non-Party; or adopts or
maintains measures with respect to the non-Party or an investor of the
non-Party that prohibit transactions with the enterprise or that would
be violated or circumvented if the benefits of the Agreement were
accorded to the enterprise or to its investments. See Services,
page 38, where this text may have a slightly different meaning.
|
|
Expropriation
|
Investment agreements include a provision that prohibits a member
country from directly or indirectly nationalizing or expropriating an
investment of an investor of another member country except when done
for a public purpose, on a nondiscriminatory basis, in accordance
with due process of law, and on payment of compensation. In an
international context, a direct expropriation occurs when the host
state takes property owned by a foreign investor located in the host
state, when there is deprivation of wealth attributable to the state.
There are very few cases of indirect expropriation at the
international level because under customary international law, a state
is not responsible for loss of property or other economic disadvantage
resulting from bona fide general taxation, regulation, forfeiture from
crime, or other action of the kind. The state has the power to take
actions, in the public interest, without having to pay compensation,
even if the interests of individual property owners may be adversely
affected. |
|
Foreign direct investment (FDI)
|
FDI
is defined as a cross-border investment in which a resident in one
economy (the direct investor) acquires a lasting interest in an
enterprise in another economy. The lasting interest implies a
long-term relationship between the direct investor and the enterprise
and usually gives the direct investor an effective voice in the
management of the enterprise. By convention, a direct investment is
established when the direct investor has acquired 10 percent or more
of the ordinary shares or voting power of an enterprise abroad.
|
|
General exceptions
|
Investment agreements usually include general exceptions, which apply
to all Parties to the Agreement and exempt these Parties from the
provisions of the Agreement. These exceptions usually refer to
measures taken for national security, public order, and international
peace and security. |
|
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
|
The
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes was
established in 1966 under the Convention on the Settlement of
Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States
(ICSID Convention). ICSID provides facilities for the conciliation and
arbitration of disputes between member countries and investors who
qualify as nationals of other member countries. All Contracting States
of ICSID are required to recognize and enforce ICSID arbitral awards.
|
|
ICSID Additional Facility Rules
|
Since 1978 the ICSID Secretariat has been administering certain types
of proceedings between States and foreign nationals which fall outside
the scope of the ICSID Convention. These include conciliation and
arbitration proceedings where either the State party or the home State
of the foreign national is not a member of ICSID. |
|
Investor-State dispute settlement mechanism
|
Investment agreements generally include provisions for an
investor-state dispute settlement mechanism whereby an investor of a
Party is able to seek redress against another Party. In most
investment agreements, the investor may choose between the local
courts and international arbitration. In some agreements, this choice
is final, in order to avoid simultaneous procedures and contradictory
decisions. A disputing investor may submit a claim to arbitration
under some specific rules of arbitration, for example the ICSID
Convention, the Additional Facility Rules of ICSID, or the UNCITRAL
Arbitration Rules. It is worth noting that the objective of an
investor-state dispute settlement mechanism is to depoliticize
investment disputes and put them into the sphere of international
arbitration. |
|
Key personnel
|
This term has generated many interpretations because it comprises two
dimensions: freedom to hire and temporary entry. The freedom to hire
refers to the right granted to the investor to employ, in senior
management positions, personnel within the host country without regard
to the nationality or citizenship of the person concerned. The
temporary entry of key personnel refers to the right granted to the
investor to enter the host country or to bring key personnel,
essential to a specific operation of an investment. Personnel is
subject to immigration laws and laws and regulations relating to the
entry, stay, and work of natural persons. |
|
Minimum standard of treatment
|
This concept is found in several investment agreements. It means that
the host country will accord treatment to investments of foreign
investors in accordance with the international norms encompassed by
the customary international law minimum standard. In general, States
would fail to meet the minimum standard of treatment if their acts
amounted to an outrage, bad faith, or an insufficiency of governmental
action so far short of international standards that every reasonable
and impartial person would readily recognize its insufficiency.
|
|
Most favored nation treatment (MFN)
|
This
principle contained in trade and investment agreements ensures that
there is no discrimination among foreigners. It guarantees that
foreign investors and their investments (those of another member
country of the trade or investment agreement) are treated no worse
than any other foreign investors and their investments. See
Services, page 39, where this text may have a slightly different
meaning. |
|
National treatment
|
This
principle contained in trade and investment agreements ensures that
there is no discrimination between foreigners and nationals. It
guarantees that foreign investors and their investments (those of
another member country of the trade or investment agreement) are
treated no worse than domestic investors and their investments. See
Services, page 39 and Tariffs and Non-tariff Measures, page 43, where
this text may have a slightly different meaning. |
|
Negative List
|
Under a negative list approach, all sectors and measures covering
investment must be liberalized unless otherwise specified in annexes
containing reservations or a list of non-conforming measures.
|
|
Non-conforming measures
|
A
non-conforming measure is any law, regulation, procedure, requirement
or practice, which violates certain articles of the investment
agreement. For example, a law prohibiting an investor of another
member country to own a factory does not conform with the article on
national treatment. |
|
Performance requirements
|
Are
used by countries to influence the behavior of investors.
Traditionally, two types of performance requirements have been
identified: mandatory performance requirements and incentive-based
performance requirements. Mandatory performance requirements are
conditions or requirements that are imposed at the pre- and/or
post-establishment phases, i.e. for the establishment and/or operation
of an investment. Incentive-based performance requirements are
conditions that an investor must meet to secure a government subsidy
or incentive. See Government Procurement, page 27 and Tariffs and
Non-tariff Measures, page 44, where this text may have a slightly
different meaning. |
|
Portfolio investment
|
It refers to shares, stocks or
other forms of equity participation in an enterprise. |
|
Post-establishment
|
It
refers to the operation of an investment. It guarantees that foreign
investors and their investments (those of another member country of
the trade or investment agreement), once established or admitted, are
treated no worse than domestic investors and their investments
(national treatment) or any other foreign investors and their
investments (most-favored-nation treatment). |
|
Pre-establishment
|
It
refers to the entry of investments and investors of a Party (member
country of a trade or investment agreement) into the territory of
another Party. Each Party allows investors of other Parties to
establish an investment in their territory on terms no less favorable
than those that apply to domestic investors (national treatment) or
investors from third countries (most-favored-nation treatment). In the
case of the provision on performance requirements, pre-establishment
refers to the prohibition of imposing certain performance requirements
as a condition for the establishment of an investment.
Pre-establishment is rarely granted without exceptions since every
country has sensitive sectors where foreign investment is not
permitted. In fact, members of a trade or investment agreement usually
list a number of measures (for example, laws and regulations) or
entire sectors where pre-establishment (free entry of investments and
investors) does not apply. |
|
Ratchet mechanism
|
Some
trade and investment agreements include this mechanism under which any
liberalization measures adopted by a member country cannot be replaced
by new measures that are more restrictive. |
|
Reservations
|
They
define any limitations to the commitments of the member countries to
the investment agreement. They are specific to each country to a trade
or investment agreement, and are taken against a limited number of
provisions. |
|
Standstill
|
Under this principle, member countries in a trade or investment
agreement commit themselves to the imposition of the status quo on
existing measures and practices which do not conform to a number of
obligations such as national treatment and most-favored-nation
treatment. Member countries commit themselves not to introduce new
legislation that would violate these obligations. Standstill do not
apply, however, to any general exceptions (e.g. national security) or
to any temporary derogations (e.g. balance-of-payments), or to any
exceptions (reservations) for future measures taken by these
countries. |
|
Transfers
|
The
provision on transfers set out in several investment agreements
guarantees that all payments relating to an investment of an investor
of another member country can be transferred in a freely convertible
or usable currency at the market rate of exchange prevailing on the
date of transfer. In some cases, these agreements allow for
limitations or exceptions, such as for balance-of payments problems.
|
|
Ad-hoc Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on
International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
|
Under the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism, an investor may
submit a claim to arbitration under some specific rules of arbitration
such as the ad-hoc arbitration rules of the United Nations Commission
for International Trade and Law. |