|
|
español - français - português |
Search
|
World Trade Organization |
WT/DS46/RW 9 May 2000 (00-1749) Original: English |
Brazil - Export Financing Programme for Aircraft
- Report of the panel
VII. CONCLUSION 7.1 For the reasons set forth in this Report, we conclude that
Brazil's measures to comply with the Panel's recommendation either do not
exist or are not consistent with the SCM Agreement. Accordingly, we conclude
that Brazil has failed to implement the DSB's 20 August 1999 recommendation
that it withdraw the export subsidies for regional aircraft under PROEX within
90 days. 7.2 Canada requests that we
suggest, pursuant to Article 19.1 of the DSU, that the parties develop
mechanisms that would allow Canada to verify compliance with the original
recommendation of the DSB. Canada notes that Brazil has a reciprocal interest
in verifying Canada's compliance in a parallel dispute, Canada – Aircraft(99).
Canada emphasises that it is not seeking a continuing role for the Panel in
proposing such verification procedures, nor is it requesting that we impose
such procedures. Brazil responds that, although it does not in principle
oppose an agreement with Canada on reciprocal transparency, it does not
consider that it is an appropriate matter for a suggestion under Article 19.1
of the DSU, but is better left to be agreed by the parties. Brazil notes that
any such agreement would have to involve balanced and truly reciprocal offers
of transparency. 99.First Submission of Canada, para. 45 Agreements | Disciplines | Trade Policy Developments | Countries | Trade & SMEs |