What's New?
 - Sitemap - Calendar
Trade Agreements - FTAA Process - Trade Issues 

espa�ol - fran�ais - portugu�s
Search

World Trade Organization

WT/DS54/R
WT/DS55/R
WT/DS59/R
WT/DS64/R


2 July 1998
(98-2505)
Original: English

Indonesia - Certain Measures Affecting the Automovile Industry

Report of the Panel

(Continued)


3. Like product

(a) Scope of "like" models

(1) Arguments of the European Communities

8.122 The European Communities asserts for purposes of its serious prejudice claims that all passenger cars must be considered as "like" products. The following are the European Communities' arguments in this regard:

8.123 In order to assess the effects of the subsidies under consideration it is necessary to define first the scope of the relevant category of "like products".

8.124 For that purpose, footnote 46 to Article 15.1 of the SCM Agreement provides the following guidance:

Throughout this agreement the term "like product" ("produit similaire") shall be interpreted to mean a product which is identical i.e. alike in all respects to the product under consideration, or in the absence of such a product, another product which, although not alike in all respects has characteristic closely resembling those of the product under consideration

8.125 All motor vehicles falling within the category of "passenger cars", as defined in Indonesia�s regulations, constitute a single category of "like products" for the purposes of the SCM Agreement given that they all share the same basic physical characteristics and serve an identical end-use. Thus, the passenger cars exported from the European Communities are like the Timor S-515.

8.126 Indonesia takes an unduly restrictive view of what constitutes a "like product". To paraphrase the Appellate Body, Indonesia has squeezed the "accordion of likeness" to a point where it can no longer sound any note.

8.127 Presently, there are more than 60 different models of passenger cars being sold in the Indonesian market. Yet, Indonesia would have the Panel to believe that the Timor S-515 is so unique that none of them is "like" the Timor S-515. By the same token, it could be claimed that each of the other models of passenger cars sold in Indonesia constitutes also a category of like products on its own. If upheld by the Panel, Indonesia�s approach would render the provisions of Part III and Part V of the SCM Agreement inapplicable except in those cases where subsidies are granted with respect to commodities or similarly homogeneous products.

8.128 The starting point for determining whether the cars exported from the European Communities are "like" the Timor S-515 must be the definition of the term "like product" contained in footnote No 46 of the SCM Agreement. That definition makes it perfectly clear that in order to be "like", two products need not be identical. In the absence of identical products, two products having "closely resembling characteristics" must be considered as "like" products. It is evident that the Timor S-515 and the passenger cars exported from the European Communities are not identical. Yet, they have sufficiently resembling characteristics to be considered as "like".

8.129 The European Communities agrees with the proposition that the term "like products" must be construed narrowly in the context of the SCM Agreement. Nevertheless, the European Communities consider that the definition of "like product" contained in footnote No 46 of that SCM Agreement already embodies such a narrow interpretation. An even narrower interpretation of the definition itself is unwarranted. 464

8.130 It is true that, within the category of passenger cars, there are virtually limitless variations in respect of factors such as size, weight, engine type, cylinder capacity, engine power, transmission system, equipment, body design, colour, etc. 465 Nevertheless, those variations do not affect the essential similarity of all passenger cars nor prevent them from being "like" products.

8.131 Any attempt to define two or more sub-categories of "like products" within the category of passenger cars on the basis of any of those criteria would unavoidably yield arbitrary results. First of all, it would require to make a necessarily arbitrary choice among all possible criteria, the only alternative being to combine several criteria simultaneously at the risk of multiplying ad infinitum the categories of "like" products. Furthermore, in respect of many of those criteria (e.g. size or cylinder capacity), there is a full continuum of products. Drawing a line within that continuum would be arbitrary, regardless of where the line is drawn. Thus, for instance, a distinction between "large" and "small" passenger cars would be arbitrary because there would always be more "likeness" between the smallest large car and the largest small car than between products at either end of each of the two categories.

8.132 If, despite the above, the Panel took the view that not all passengers cars are "like products", the European Communities submit that, at the very least, the Opel Optima and the Peugeot 306 must be considered as being "like" the Timor S-515. The table below contains an exhaustive comparison of their physical characteristics. That comparison confirms beyond doubt that the Timor S-515 and the European Communities models concerned, albeit not alike in all respects, have closely resembling characteristics. The European Communities also has submitted sales brochures of the Timor S-515, the Peugeot 306 and the Opel Optima.

Table 22

Comparison of Certain Models

Marque

Make

Modele

Basic model

Peugeot

306

1.8

St

Peugeot

306

1.8

St LM

Opel

Optima

1.8

GLS

Opel

Optima

1.8

New CDX

Timor

S515

1.5

Timor

S515i

1.5

I/Mechanical Features

Length (mm)

4,240

4,240

4,329

4,329

4,360

4,360

Height (mm)

1,367

1,367

1,410

1,410

1,390

1,390

Width (mm)

1,692

1,692

1,688

1,688

1,692

1,692

Wheel Base (mm)

2,580

2,580

2,517

2,517

2,500

2,500

Petrol or Diesel Engine

XU7JP

XU7JP

MPFI

MPFI

85C

EFI

Cubic Capacity (cm3)

1,761

1,761

1,796

1,796

1,498

1,498

Number of Cylinders

4

4

4

4

4

4

Number of Valves/Cylinder

8V

8V

8V

8V

8V

16V

Maximum Power (DIN/ch)

103

103

118

118

-

-

Nbr RPM

6,000

6,000

5,400

5,400

-

-

Maximum Power (JIS/ch)

82

105

Nbr RPM

5,500

5,500

Maxi torque (DIN)

16.0

16.0

16.3

16.3

-

-

Maxi torque (JIS)

12.2

15.0

Nbr RPM

3,000

3,000

3,200

3,200

2,500

4,000

Carburetor/Injection

I

I

I

I

C

I

Manual Gear Box (NB. of Speeds)

5

5

5

5

5

5

Automatic Gear Box (NB. of Speeds)

-

-

-

-

-

-

Brakes (Disc/drums/Ventil.)

VD/DR

VD/DR

D/DR

D/DR

VD/DR

VD/DR

Anti-lock Brake system

-

-

-

X

-

-

Power Steering

X

X

X

X

X

X

II/Outside Features

Number of Doors

4

4

4

4

4

4

Additional Headlamps

-

-

X

X

-

-

Bodyside Mouldings

X

X

X

X

X

X

Rear Spoiler

-

-

-

-

X

X

Light Alloy Wheels

-

X

X

X

-

-

Tyre Size

185/65/R14

185/65/R14

195/60/R14

195/60/R14

175/70/R13

175/70/R13

Metallic Paint

X

X

X

X

-

O

Tinted Glass

X

X

X

X

X

X

III/Inside Equipment

Air Bag (1/2)

-

-

-

1

-

-

Side Impacts Beams

X

X

X

X

X

X

Central Door Locking

X

X

X

X

X

X

Adjustable Steering Column

X

X

X

X

-

X

Electric Windows Front/Rear

F/R

F/R

F/R

F/R

X

X

Electric Windows (Front/1 Touch)

FR/one T

FR/one T

FR/one T

FR/one T

-

X

Driver Side Mirror Manu./Electr.

E

E

E

E

M

E

Passenger Side Mirror Manu./Elec.

E

E

E

E

M

E

Alarm System

-

-

X

X

-

-

Air Conditioning

X

X

X

X

X

X

Radio Equipment

X

X

X

X

-

X

Height Adjust. Frt Seats Manu./Elec

M

M

M

M

M

M

Rear Seat Folding

1/3-2/3

1/3-2/3

1/3-2/3

1/3-2/3

-

-

Rear Head Restraints

X

X

X

X

X

X

TRIM

VELOURS

LEATHER

VELOURS

VELOURS

CLOTH

CLOTH

Number of Rear Seat Belts

3

3

3

3

3

3

3rd Braking Light

X

X

X

X

X

X

8.133 Should the Panel take the view that it is necessary to distinguish two or more "segments" within the category of passenger cars, the European Communities would refer the Panel to the classification made in the DRI Reports. According to the DRI Reports, the models of passenger cars sold in Indonesia between 1994 and 1997 may be classified into four segments, as follows:

Segment B ("Supermini Class"): Daihatsu Charade, Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Esteem, Toyota Starlet;

Segment C ("Lower Medium Class"): Daewoo Cielo, Ford Laser, Honda City, Honda Civic, Hyundai Accent/Bimantara Cakra, Peugeot 306, Opel Optima, Mitsubishi Lancer, Mazda 323, Mazda MR 90, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corona, Kia Sephia/Timor S-515;

Segment D ("Upper Medium Class"): Audi A4, Daewoo Cielo, Ford Telstar, Honda Accord, Hyundai Elantra/Bimantara Nenggala, Mazda 626, Mitsubishi Galant, Opel Vectra, Peugeot 405/406;

Segment E ("Executive Class"): Audi A6, BMW 3 Series, BMW 5 series, BMW 7 series, Mercedes Benz C class, Mercedes Benz E class, Mercedes Benz S class, Nissan Cedric, Nissan Zafiro, Toyota Crown, Volvo U.

According to the DRI Reports, no model was sold within Segment A ("Utility Class").

8.134 Indonesia cannot reasonably deny that the Timor and the EC cars, and in particular the Opel Optima and the Peugeot 306, have closely resembling physical characteristics. For that reason, Indonesia is forced to emphasize the importance of what it terms "non-physical characteristics". (See Section VIII.B.3). These include a long list of vague and essentially subjective criteria, such as "brand reputation", "status", "quality", "reliability", etc. which cannot be properly measured and compared. If the Panel upheld Indonesia's view that two vehicles which have closely resembling physical characteristics may nevertheless not be "like" because of differences in factors such as "quality" or "brand reputation", it would be opening the door to all kinds of arbitrary and abusive distinctions. An examination of prior Panel reports shows that alleged differences regarding non-physical characteristics have never been regarded as determinant for a like product determination. For instance, in the 1987 case on Japan - Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages466, Japan claimed that high quality Scotch whisky was not "like" domestic Japanese whisky of inferior quality. The Panel rightly ignored those arguments and concluded that all whisky was "like". In relative terms, there is no more difference between a Mercedes and a Timor than between a premium brand of malt Scotch whisky and a Japanese brand of second grade whisky made by adding water to a concentrate.

8.135 To be precise, the European Communities' position is that cars which have closely resembling physical characteristics do not become "unlike" simply because of alleged differences in so-called "non-physical characteristics."

8.136 "Riding comfort" is determined by the physical characteristics of a car. The same is true of "quality". "Reputation for quality" is one of the factors which make up the "brand image of a product." It is obvious that "brand image" may influence consumers' choices. In the European Communities' view, however, mere differences in brand image do not suffice to make two products "unlike". Moreover, this criterion is largely subjective, cannot be accurately measured, and may change over time. For instance, by definition new entrants lack an established "brand image". Thus, on Indonesia's construction, a subsidizing Member could always claim that subsidies for the establishment of a new domestic industry cannot cause "serious prejudice" to imports.

(2) Arguments of the United States

8.137 The United States argues that the passenger cars which, but for the National Motor Vehicle programme, United States motor vehicle manufacturers would have sold in Indonesia, are "like" the Timor Kia Sephia sedan. The following are the United States' arguments in this regard:

8.138 Footnote 46 of the SCM Agreement defines "like product" in the following manner:

Throughout this Agreement the term "like product" ("produit similaire") shall be interpreted to mean a product which is identical, i.e. alike in all respects to the product under consideration, or in the absence of such a product, another product which, although not alike in all respects, has characteristics closely resembling those of the product under consideration.

8.139 Obviously, this definition provides only general guidance, and a case-by-case analysis is necessary to determine whether a particular product is "like" another. In this regard, the guidance provided by the Appellate Body in connection with the application of the "like product" concept for purposes of the WTO agreements is particularly apt: 467

No one approach to exercising judgement will be appropriate for all cases. The criteria in Border Tax Adjustments should be examined, but there can be no one precise and absolute definition of what is "like". The concept of "likeness" is a relative one that evokes the image of an accordion. The accordion of "likeness" stretches and squeezes in different places as different provisions of the WTO Agreement are applied. The width of the accordion in any one of those places must be determined by the particular provision in which the term "like" is encountered as well as by the context and the circumstances that prevail in any given case to which that provision may apply.

Factors which should be considered in applying a case-by-case analysis include "a product�s end-uses in a given market, consumers� tastes and habits, which change from country to country, and the product�s properties, nature and quality." 468

(a) The passenger cars that the United States would have sold in Indonesia are comparable to the Timor.

8.140 With this analytical framework in mind, let us now turn to an analysis of specific passenger cars of US motor vehicle manufacturers. Because of the National Motor Vehicle programme, there currently are virtually no passenger cars of US manufacturers that are imported and sold in Indonesia. 469 However, the passenger cars that were imported and sold in Indonesia prior to the introduction of the National Motor Vehicle programme were "like" the Timor Kia Sephia sedan. In addition, the passenger cars that, but for the National Motor Vehicle programme, would have been imported and sold in Indonesia are "like" the Timor Kia Sephia sedan.

8.141 Prior to the introduction of the National Motor Vehicle programme, General Motors sold two passenger cars under its "Opel" brand that easily can be considered as "like" the Timor Kia Sephia sedan. These are the Opel Optima and the Opel Vectra.

8.142 The Opel Optima and the Timor Kia Sephia both fall within "Segment C" of the motor vehicle market (lower medium class passenger cars). 470 Moreover, as set out in Table 23, below, the specifications for the Optima and the Timor Kia Sephia are quite comparable. The size and weight of the two cars are virtually identical, while the Optima has a slightly bigger engine.

8.143 With respect to the Opel Vectra, while it is positioned slightly higher in the market than the Optima or the Timor Kia Sephia471, in terms of specifications, as set out in Table 23, it is not all that dissimilar to the Timor Kia Sephia. The Vectra is slightly larger than the Timor Kia Sephia (e.g., the Vectra is about 100mm longer than the Timor Kia Sephia), and has a more powerful engine. However, both cars share the same end-uses; i.e., to transport passengers.

8.144 Turning to Ford, Ford had well-advanced plans to import and sell Ford Escorts in Indonesia, plans that Ford had to abandon in light of the National Motor Vehicle programme and the introduction of the heavily subsidized Timor Kia Sephia sedan. Like the Timor Kia Sephia, the Escort falls in Segment C of the passenger car market. 472 A comparison of specifications, as set forth in Table 23, confirms the similarities between the Escort and the Timor Kia Sephia and the fact that the Escort is "like" the Timor Kia Sephia. The Timor Kia Sephia is a little bit longer (65mm) and a little bit higher (44mm) than the Escort, while the Escort is a little bit wider (183mm) and has a slightly larger engine (1597cc versus 1498cc for the Timor Kia Sephia).

8.145 The following table demonstrates that the Timor Kia Sephia, the Opel Optima, and the Ford Escort are quite comparable in terms of specifications: 473

Table 23

Timor, Escort, and Opel Specifications

Items

Timor S515

Ford

Escort4dr "Ghia" Notchback Manual Transmission

Opel Optima

Opel Vectra

Dimensions

1. Overall length (mm)

4,360

4,295

4,329

4,477

2. Overall width (mm)

1,692

1,875

1,688

1,707

3. Overall height (mm)

1,390

1,346

1,410

1,425

4. Wheel base (mm)

2,500

2,523

2,517

2,637

5. Turning circle (m)

5.1

10

4.9

6. Curb weight (kg)

1,055

1,145

980

Engine

1. Type

4 cyl, inline, SOHC, carburetor

4 cyl., Zetec

inline

4 cyl., 8 valves, Multi-Port Fuel injection (MPFI)

4 cyl., 8 valves Multi-Port Fuel injection (MPFI)

2. Displacement (cc)

1,498

1,597

1,796

1,998

3. Max. Power

85PS/5,500rpm

l75@ 5500

118 PS/5,400 rpm

136 hp

Transmission

Gear Ratio:

-1st

3.417

3.10

3.58

--

-2nd

1.895

1.19

2.14

--

-3rd

1.296

1.28

1.48

--

-4th

0.906

0.95

1.12

--

-5th

0.738

0.76

0.89

--

-Reverse

3.736

3.615

3.333

--

8.146 Finally, with respect to Chrysler, Chrysler had plans to import and sell its Neon passenger car in Indonesia. The table below presents a comparison of the specifications of the Neon and the Timor Kia Sephia. The data show that the Chrysler Neon closely resembles the Timor Kia Sephia, and, thus, can be considered a "like product" to the Sephia. The Neon is only 4 mm longer, 16 mm wider, and 5 mm taller than the Sephia, and is only 54 kilogrammes heavier. Also, although the Neon has a larger engine, both the Neon and the Timor Kia Sephia fall within the C segment, and, thus, in the view of the industry, compete for the same customers. 474 As such, the Neon can safely be considered as "like" the Timor Kia Sephia.

8.147 The specifications for the Chrysler Neon that would have been sold in Indonesia but for the National Car Programme are as follows:

Table 24

Timor and Neon Specifications

Items

Timor S515

Chrysler Neon

Dimensions

1. Overall length (mm)

4,360

4,364

2. Overall width (mm)

1,692

1,708

3. Overall height (mm)

1,390

1,395

4. Wheel base (mm)

2,500

2,642

5. Turning circle (m)

5.1

10.8

6. Curb weight (kg)

1,055

1,109

Engine

1. Type

4 cyl, inline, SOHC, carburetor

4 cyl. inline MPI SOHC

2. Displacement (cc)

1,498

1,996

3. Max. Power

85 PS/5,000rpm

98@ 5,850 rpm

8.148 To summarize, the passenger cars that US manufacturers did import and sell in Indonesia, as well as the passenger cars that they would have imported and sold in Indonesia, can be considered as "like products" to the Timor Kia Sephia. While none of these US passenger cars is "identical" to the Timor Kia Sephia, identity between motor vehicles is not required under the SCM Agreement. If identify of products were required, it is difficult to fathom how there ever could be a serious prejudice dispute (or a countervailing duty proceeding, for that matter) involving motor vehicles or any other type of consumer good, where slight variations in models or products are made for the very purpose of distinguishing products in competition with one another. Instead, under the SCM Agreement, it is enough that one product has "characteristics closely resembling" those of the subsidized product. The Opel Optima and Vectra, the Ford Escort, and the Chrysler Neon each satisfy this standard.

To continue with The GM Opel Blazer is comparable to the Kia Sportage


464 Indonesia�s claim that the notion of "like product" should be construed even more narrowly in the context of an exception granted in favour of developing Members is simply non-sensical. The notion of "like product" is an objective one and cannot have different meanings depending on the GDP level of the subsidising country Member.

465 Some of the criteria enumerated by Indonesia as being relevant for a like product determination are too subjective (e.g. "reputation") or vague (e.g. "quality" or "ride and contort") for being measurable. Price is not relevant for a like product determination, especially when as in the present case one of the products concerned benefits from a huge subsidy, and the imported products are subject to the payment of very high import duties. As noted by the Panel Report on Japan - Customs Duties, Taxes and Labelling Practices on Imported Wines and Alcoholic Beverages, adopted on 10 November 1987, BISD 34/119:

"...like products do not become "unlike"... merely because of .... differences in their prices, which were often influenced by external measures (e.g. customs duties) and market conditions (e.g. supply and demand, sales margins)"

466 Panel report on Japan - Customs Duties. Taxes and Labelling Practices on Imported Wines and Alcoholic Beverages adopted 10 November 1987, BISD 34S/83, 118.

467 "Japan - Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages," WT/DS8/R, Report of the Appellate Body, adopted 1 November 1996, p. 22.

468 Id., p. 21, citing to Report of the Working Party on Border Tax Adjustments, BISD 18S/97, para. 18.

469 See AV/13, p. 3 (Question 6) and Attachment 8 (Question 6).

470 See McGraw-Hill World Car Industry Forecast Report, February 1997, pp. 284-85, included as Annex 1 to AV/2. Cars falling within a particular market segment will roughly be of the same size, be in the same price range, and share the same target customers.

471 The Vectra falls within "Segment D" (upper medium class) of the passenger car market. Id.

472 See McGraw-Hill World Car Industry Forecast Report, February 1997, pp. 284-85, included as Annex 1 to AV/2.

473 Source: US companies.

474 Id.