|
REVISED TREATY OF CHAGUARAMAS ESTABLISHING THE CARIBBEAN COMMUNITY INCLUDING THE CARICOM
SINGLE MARKET AND ECONOMY
(Continuation)
CHAPTER FIVE
TRADE POLICY
PART THREE
SUBSIDIES
ARTICLE 107
Request for Consultations Relating to Subsidies Causing
Injury, Nullification, Impairment or Serious Prejudice
1. Whenever a Member State has reason to believe that a subsidy within the
meaning of Article 96 has been granted or is maintained by another Member
State, and that imports from such a Member State have resulted in any of
the effects mentioned in paragraph 1(b) of Article 97, the first-mentioned
Member State may approach the Member State believed to be granting a
subsidy with a request for consultations.
2. A request for consultations shall include a statement of available
evidence with regard to -
(a) the existence and nature of the subsidy; and
(b) the injury caused to the domestic industry; or
(c) the impairment or nullification of benefits of exporting to other
Member States in the Community; or
(d) serious prejudice to its interests.
3. Upon receipt of a request for consultations under paragraph 1, the
Member State believed to be granting or maintaining the subsidy shall
reply within 10 days, and shall furnish relevant information and enter
into consultations within 30 days of the date of the request. The purpose
of the consultations shall be to clarify the facts relating to the
existence, type and effect of the alleged subsidy and to arrive at a
mutually agreed solution.
ARTICLE 108
Reference to COTED to Investigate Subsidies Causing
Injury, Nullification, Impairment or Serious Prejudice
1. If no mutually agreed solution is reached at the completion of 60 days
from the date of request for consultations, or on a date mutuallyagreed,
the Member State requesting consultations may refer the matter to COTED
which shall initiate an investigation, make a determination to resolve the
dispute and issue a report within 120 days of the date of the request for
an investigation by the aggrieved Member State.
2. A decision by COTED to initiate an investigation shall not prevent the
aggrieved Member State from taking, on a provisional basis,
countermeasures which shall not be sooner than 60 days from the date of
initiation of a preliminary investigation by the national authority to
forestall or prevent further adverse effects.
ARTICLE 109
Investigation by COTED of Subsidies Causing Injury,
Nullification, Impairment or Serious Prejudice
1. In order to arrive at a determination of the existence, degree and
effect of subsidisation, and remedial action which may be taken pursuant
to the referral of a complaint of alleged subsidisation mentioned in
Article 108, CO TED shall -
(a) carry out an investigation into the circumstances relating to the
alleged grant or maintenance of the subsidy by the offending Member State;
the investigation is to be completed within 120 days of the date of
receipt of a complaint regarding alleged subsidisation by an offending
Member State; and 71.
(b) upon receipt of the report arising from the investigation, promptly
make available the report to the concerned Member States to facilitate
consultation and to permit the Member states concerned to arrive at a
mutually acceptable solution.
ARTICLE 110
Consequences of Failure to Remove Subsidies Causing
Injury, Nullification, Impairment or Serious Prejudice
1. If no mutually acceptable solution is reached within 30 days of the
date of issue of the report by COTED, and COTED is satisfied:
(a) of the existence of a subsidy within the meaning of Article 105; and
(b) that the subsidy has caused injury to the enterprise in the aggrieved
Member State; or
(c) that the subsidy has impaired or nullified benefits expected of the
aggrieved Member State with respect to its exports to the Community; or
(d) that the effect of the subsidy was to seriously prejudice the
interests of the Member State, then in such a case, COTED shall request
the Member State which has granted or maintained the subsidy to take
appropriate steps to remedy the effects of the subsidy within six months
of the date of the issue of the report by COTED.
2. If, at the end of the period of six months allowed by COTED to the
Member State granting or maintaining the subsidy to remedy the effects of
the subsidy, the Member State fails to comply and in the absence of
agreement on compensation COTED shall authorise the aggrieved Member State
to impose countervailing duties at a rate equivalent to the amount of
subsidisation for such time and under such conditions as COTED may
prescribe.
ARTICLE 111
Types of Subsidies Causing Serious Adverse Effects
1. The Member States shall not ordinarily impose or introduce
countervailing duties or take countermeasures on products which benefit
from:
(a) subsidies which are not specific within the meaning of Article 97; or
(b) subsidies which are specific within the meaning of Article 97 but
which satisfy all of the conditions set out in this sub-paragraph
hereunder:
(i) subsidies granted for research activities conducted by enterprises or
by higher education or research establishments on a contract basis with
firms if the assistance covers not more than 75 per cent of the costs of
industrial research or 50 per cent of the costs of pre- competitive
development activity and provided that such assistance is limited
exclusively to:
(aa) costs of personnel (researchers, technicians and other supporting
staff employed exclusively in the research activity);
(bb) costs of instruments, equipment, land and buildings used exclusively
and permanently (except when disposed of on a commercial basis) for the
research activity;
(cc) costs of consultancy and equivalent services used exclusively for the
research activity, including bought-in research, technical knowledge,
patents, etc.;
(dd) additional overhead costs incurred directly as a result of the
research activity;
(ee) other running costs (such as those of materials, supplies and the
like), incurred directly as a result of the research activity.
(c) subsidies granted to assist disadvantaged regions within the territory
of a Member State given pursuant to a general framework of regional
development and that are non-specific within eligible regions provided
that:
(i) each disadvantaged region must be a clearly designated contiguous
geographical area with a definable economic and administrative identify;
(ii) the Region is considered as disadvantaged on the basis of neutral and
objective criteria, indicating that the region's difficulties arise out of
more than temporary circumstances; such criteria must be clearly spelled
out in law, regulation, or other official document, so as to be capable of
verification;
(iii) the criteria shall include a measurement of economic development
which shall be based on at least one of the following factors:
(aa) one of either income per capita or household income per capita, or
GDP per capita, which must not be above 85 per cent of the average for the
territory concerned;
(bb) unemployment rate, which must be at least 110 per cent of the average
for the territory concerned;
(d) subsidies granted to assist entities in the adaptation of existing
facilities to new environmental requirements imposed by law and/or
regulations which result in greater constraints and financial burden on
enterprises provided that the subsidies -
(i) are a one-time non-recurring measure; and
(ii) are limited to 20 per cent of the cost of adaptation; and
(iii) do not cover the cost of replacing and operating the assisted
investment, which must be fully borne by firms; and
(iv) are directly linked to and proportionate to a firm's planned
reduction of nuisances and pollution, and do not cover any manufacturing
cost savings which may be achieved; and
(v) are available to all firms which can adopt the new equipment and/or
production processes.
(e) subsidies granted to assist enterprises to undertake training or
retraining of employees, whether or not the enterprise is new, and the
upgrading of existing facilities to facilitate transition to competitive
status within the Community, provided that such subsidies are not
specific.
2. The Member States shall notify COTED of any subsidy mentioned in
paragraph 1. Any Member State may request further information regarding a
notified subsidy programme and COTED shall review annually all notified
subsidies referred to in paragraph 1.
ARTICLE 112
Preliminary Investigation of Subsidies
Causing Serious Adverse Effects
1. A domestic industry may submit to the competent authority an
application for an investigation to verify that serious adverse effects
have been caused by imports which benefit from subsidies referred to in
Article 111.
2. Upon receipt of an application for an investigation to verify adverse
effects, the authority shall examine the application, and, on the basis of
the available facts, determine whether to initiate an investigation.
3. The investigation referred to in paragraph 2 shall be deemed a
preliminary investigation. The authority shall give public notice of its
decision to initiate a preliminary investigation and the concerned Member
State, other interested Member States, and the interested persons shall
all be invited to provide relevant information and make comments.
4. The results of the preliminary investigation shall be made available to
the concerned Member State, other interested Member States and the
interested persons to enable them to defend their interests.
ARTICLE 113
Request for Consultations Relating to Subsidies
Causing Serious Adverse Effects
1. Whenever a Member State has reason to believe that imports from another
Member State benefited from subsidies within the meaning of Article 111
and such imports have resulted in serious adverse effects to a domestic
industry so as to cause damage which would be difficult to repair, the
Member State aggrieved may request consultations with the Member State
granting or maintaining the subsidy.
2. The Member State alleged to be granting the subsidy which caused
adverse effects shall reply within 10 days of the date of the request for
consultations and shall enter into the consultations requested by the
aggrieved Member State. If there is no mutual agreement within 60 days of
the date of the request for such consultations or on a later date which
was mutually agreed or if the Member State refuses to co-operate, the
aggrieved Member State may refer the matter to COTED and request COTED to
carry out an investigation.
ARTICLE 114
Investigation by COTED of Subsidies
Causing Serious Adverse Effects
1. The referral of the matter to COTED for an investigation shall not
prevent the aggrieved Member State from imposing on a provisional basis
not sooner than 60 days from the date of initiation of the preliminary
investigation referred to in Article 106, countermeasures to forestall or
prevent further adverse effects.
2. If COTED is satisfied that the investigation requested isjustified,
COTED shall carry out the investigation, make a determination and issue a
report within 120 days from the date when the request was referred.
3. Where the results of the investigation carried out by CO TED
demonstrate that the subsloised imports caused serious adverse effects to
the domestic industry of the aggrieved Member State requesting the
investigation, COTED shall recommend that the offending Member State
modify the programme of subsidies in such a way as to remove the adverse
effects complained of:
ARTICLE 115
Consequences of Failure to Eliminate or
Establish Adverse Effects of Subsidies
1. If the offending Member State fails to implement the recommendations of
CO TED within 6 months of the date of issue of the report referred to in
paragraph 2 of Article 114, COTED shall authorise the aggrieved Member
State to impose appropriate countervailing duties commensurate with the
nature and degree of serious adverse effects determined to exist.
2. Whenever the results of an investigation by COTED prove that serious
adverse effects have not been caused by subsidised imports referred to in
paragraph 1 of Article 111, the Member State alleging that its domestic
industry has suffered serious adverse effects shall promptly refund any
duties which might have been provisionally imposed and where such
provisional duties had materially retarded the exports of the Member State
complained against, CO TED shall, upon application from such State, assess
the effects of the provisionally applied duties and determine the nature
and extent of compensation which is warranted and require compensation in
accordance with its assessment.
ARTICLE 116
Imposition of Provisional Measures
and Countervailing Duties
1. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Chapter; a Member
State aggrieved by the application or maintenance of prohibited subsidies
or by subsidies which cause injury, or result in nullification,
impairment, or serious prejudice, or cause serious adverse effects, as the
case may be, shall introduce provisional measures only on the basis of the
following rules:
(a) Provisional measures may be applied only if -
(i) a preliminary investigation has been initiated in accordance with the
provisions of this Chapter; a public notice has been given to that effect
and interested persons have been given adequate opportunities to submit
information and make comments;
(ii) an affirmative preliminary determination has been made of the
existence of a prohibited subsidy, or a subsidy causing injury,
nullification, impairment, serious prejudice, or a subsidy causing serious
adverse effects, as the case may be;
(iii) consultations were requested and undertaken, COTED was notified and
requested to investigate and the authorities concerned judge such measures
necessary to prevent injury being caused during the investigation;
(b) Provisional measures may take the form of provisional countervailing
duties guaranteed by cash deposits or bonds equal to the amount of the
subsidisation calculated on a provisional basis;
(c) Provisional measures shall not be applied sooner than 60 days from the
date of initiation of the preliminary investigation;
(d) The application of provisional measures shall be limited to as short a
period as possible, not exceeding 120 days.
2. Where investigations by COTED continue beyond the period allowed for
the maintenance of provisional measures under sub-paragraph 1 (d), the
Member State imposing the measures may continue with such measures until a
definitive determination is made by COTED.
3. The Member States which are parties to an investigation to verify the
existence and the effect of alleged subsidisation, may seek or accept, as
the case may be, undertakings from the Member State alleged to have
granted or to be maintaining a subsidy. Undertakings may take the form of.
(a) withdrawal, or limiting the amount o~ the subsidy to such an extent
that injury, nullification, impairment, serious prejudice or serious
adverse effects, as the case may be, are eliminated; or
(b) a guarantee from the exporter benefiting from the subsidy to raise his
price to such an extent that the injurious effect is eliminated.
4. If a Member State accepts a voluntary guarantee pursuant to sub-
paragraph 3(b), then the accepting Member State shall notify COTED and
promptly suspend proceedings, and any provisional measures which may have
been imposed shall be withdrawn with immediate effect.
5. In the event that investigations to determine subsidisation have been
concluded and the evidence proves injury, nullification, impairment or
serious prejudice, or serious adverse effects, as the case may be, a
Member State may impose countervailing duties retroactively to account for
the entire period during which provisional measures have been in force.
Such retroactively applied duties shall take into account the definitively
assessed countervailing duties and the amount guaranteed by cash deposit
or bond and:
(a) where the definitive countervailing duties are higher than the
provisional duties, the difference shall not be collected;
(b) where the definitive countervailing duties are lower than the
provisional duties, the excess of the deposit shall be refunded or the
bond released promptly.
6. No Member State shall impose countervailing duties other than
provisional countervailing duties without prior authorisation from COTED
and the determination and imposition of definitive countervailing duties
shall be governed by the relevant provisions of the WTO Agreement on
Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.
7. COTED shall keep under review all counter-measures imposed by the
Member States and shall ensure that the Member States observe the
conditions and timetable for review and withdrawal of counter-measures
that it may have authorised.
8. The Member States undertake to co-operate in establishing harmonised
legislation and procedures in accordance with the provisions of this
Chapter.
|
Continue on to: PART
FOUR: SUBSIDIES TO AGRICULTURE |
[ Return
to the
Index
] |
|