NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT CHAPTER 19 BINATIONAL PANEL DECISION |
|
FINAL DECISION
|
|
|
REVIEW OF THE FINAL DETERMINATION
OF THE ANTIDUMPING INVESTIGATION
ON IMPORTS OF HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP,
ORIGINATING FROM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
|
|
CASE: MEX-USA-98-1904-01
Courtesy Translation |
|
|
PANEL: |
|
VÍCTOR BLANCO FORNIELES |
|
HÉCTOR CUADRA Y MORENO |
|
HOWARD N. FENTON |
|
SAUL L. SHERMAN |
|
GUSTAVO VEGA CÁNOVAS (Chairman) |
INDEX
|
I. |
Background |
II. |
Issues brought by the
Claimants |
|
II.A |
The Determination issued by the IA on
November 23, 2001 is not the Remand Report in conformity with the
Instructions of the Panel. |
|
II.B |
The IA presumes to base its conclusions in
Administrative Record 2 that it is not before the Panel. |
|
II.C |
The SE presumes to base its new determination
in documents that do not form part of the AR. Specifically references
made to Record 1912 contained in paragraphs 31, 53 and 63, among others. |
|
II.D |
The analysis provided by the IA in the new
Determination of November 23, 2001 is a reiteration and repetition of the
arguments used in the two previous Determinations (January 23, 1998 and
September 20, 2000) and, therefore, the arguments filed by the IA in the
Determination of November 23, 2001 do not prove, as the arguments
contained in the Revised Determination of September 20, 2000 did not
prove, that the threat of injury is a direct result of imports and thus
articles 39 and 42 of the FTC were violated. |
|
|
II.D.A |
Imports Subject to Price Discrimination and
Export Capacity |
|
|
II.D.B |
Price Analysis |
|
|
II.D.C |
Impact on the Domestic Industry |
|
|
II.D.D |
Compliance with the Antidumping Agreement |
|
|
II.D.E |
Compliance with Mexican Law |
III. |
Analysis and Resolutions of the Panel about
the Remand Report |
|
III.A |
Imports Subject to Price Discrimination and
Export Capacity |
|
III.B |
Price Analysis |
|
III.C |
Impact on Domestic Industry |
ORDER |
|
|